Superior Capsular Reconstruction Research Articles

Subacromial Surgery for Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears

The irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tear describes a tear of the supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendon that is massive, contracted, and immobile in both the anterior–posterior and medial–lateral directions. Patients with an intact subscapularis and preserved forward elevation are challenging to treat because there is not a consensus treatment algorithm. For low-demand, elderly patients, several subacromial surgical options are available that can provide pain relief without the risks or burden of rehabilitation posed by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty or a complex soft-tissue reconstruction (e.g., superior capsular reconstruction, tendon transfer, bridging grafts). Debridement, more specifically the “smooth-and-move” procedure, offers a reliable outcome with documented improvements in pain and function at long-term follow-up. Similarly, the biodegradable subacromial balloon spacer (InSpace; Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI) has been shown to significantly improve pain and function in patients who are not responsive to nonoperative treatment. Disease progression with these options is possible, with a small percentage of patients progressing to rotator cuff arthropathy. Biologic tuberoplasty and bursal acromial reconstruction are conceptually similar to the balloon spacer but instead use biologic grafts to prevent bone-to-bone contact between the humeral head and the acromion. Although there is no single gold standard treatment, the variety of surgical techniques allows patients and surgeons to effectively manage these challenging situations.

Bioaugmentation demonstrates similar outcomes and failure rates for arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair compared to revision without bioaugmentation

IntroductionArthroscopic revision rotator cuff repairs exhibit lower healing rates and inferior outcomes compared to primary repairs. There is limited evidence regarding the use of bioaugmentation in the setting of revision rotator cuff repairs. Autologous conditioned plasma (ACP) is a promising adjunct that has been shown to improve healing rates and patient report outcomes in the primary setting. In addition, bioinductive patches such as collagen bovine patches have become a popular adjunct for stimulating healing in the primary setting. The aim of this study is to assess the outcomes after use of ACP and collagen bovine patch augmentation for revision arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. We hypothesized improved patient report outcomes and higher healing rates would be observed with bioaugmentation for revision repair compared to without. MethodsThis was an IRB approved, retrospective case-control study from two fellowship-trained surgeons that included all consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair from 2010 to 2021. Reconstruction such as superior capsular reconstruction, partial revision repair, and less than one year follow-up were excluded. The bioaugmentation cohort received ACP and/or collagen bovine patch at the time of revision repair. Patient reported outcomes were collected from all patients including: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Assessment Form (ASES), visual analog scale for pain (VAS), Brophy score, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) mental and physical scores. Failure of revision rotator cuff repair was defined as an ASES postoperative total score less than 60 or a symptomatic re-tear confirmed on MRI. Students T-test was used for all comparisons of continuous variables. Chi-squared used for comparison of all categorical variables. Statistical significance was set at <0.05. ResultsThirty-eight patients met inclusion criteria with average follow-up of 3.5±1.7 years. There was no significant difference in follow-up between patients with and without bioaugmentation. Of the 38 patients, 14 patients met failure criteria. There was no significant difference in the rate of failure between the bioaugmentation cohort (6/19, 31.6%) versus patients who did not receive bioaugmentation (8/19, 42.1%), p=0.74) In addition, no significant differences were identified for ASES (64.6±20.1 versus 57.5±17.2, p=0.32), Brophy (6.4±5.2 versus 6.0±4.1, p=0.84), PROMIS Mental (13.4±3.9 versus 11.7±3.2) or PROMIS Physical (12.8±3.1 versus 11.9±3.2) scores between the bioaugmentation versus no bioaugmentation groups. ConclusionsBioaugmentation with a bioinductive collagen patch or autologous conditioned plasma demonstrated similar failure and patient reported outcomes compared to without bioaugmentation in the setting of revision rotator cuff repair.

Biomechanical Comparison Between Superior Capsular Reconstruction and Lower Trapezius Tendon Transfer in Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears

Background: Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) and lower trapezius tendon transfer (LTT) have recently been used to manage irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears (PSRCTs). There has been a paucity of comparative biomechanical considerations between the 2 procedures. Purpose: To compare the glenohumeral stability and biomechanical properties between SCR and LTT in PSRCTs involving the entire infraspinatus tendon region. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested at 0°, 20°, and 40° of shoulder abduction. Maximum internal, external, and total humeral range of motion (ROM), superior translation of the humeral head, and subacromial contact characteristics were compared among 4 conditions: (1) intact rotator cuff, (2) PSRCTs involving the entire infraspinatus tendon region, (3) LTT using Achilles allograft (12 N and 24 N of loading), and (4) SCR using fascia lata allograft. Results: Although a decrease in total ROM was noted in LTT with 12 N compared with the tear condition, LTT with both 12 N and 24 N as well as SCR did not restrict total rotational ROM compared with the intact condition. LTT had decreased total ROM compared with tear condition at 20° of abduction (P = .042), while no significant decrease was confirmed at all abduction angles after SCR. SCR and LTT with 24 N decreased superior translation compared with the PSRCT condition at 0° and 20° of abduction (P < .037) but not significantly at 40° of abduction, whereas LTT with a 24-N load decreased glenohumeral superior translation at all abduction angles (P < .039). Both SCR and LTT decreased subacromial contact pressure compared with the tear condition (P < .014) at all abduction angles. SCR decreased subacromial contact pressure at 0° and 40° of abduction (P = .019 and P = .048, respectively) compared with LTT with 12 N of loading, while there was no difference between SCR and LTT with 24 N of loading in all abduction angles. SCR increased the contact area compared with the PSRCT condition at all abduction angles (P < .023), whereas LTT did not increase the contact area. Conclusion: SCR and LTT decreased glenohumeral superior translation and contact pressure compared with PSRCT conditions. The LTT was superior to SCR in terms of superior translation of the humeral head at a higher shoulder abduction angle, whereas the SCR showed more advantageous subacromial contact characteristics compared with LTT. Clinical Relevance: These biomechanical findings provide insights into these 2 fundamentally different procedures for the treatment of young and active patients with PSRCTs involving the entire infraspinatus tendon region.

Effect of age and gender in rates of achieving minimal clinically important difference and patient-acceptable symptom state 2 years after arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction.

This study aimed to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and the effects of gender and age on achieving clinically significant outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR) with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients undergoing ASCR for irreparable rotator cuff tear between 2013 and 2020 were reviewed. Preoperative and minimum 2-year postoperative PROMs were collected, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant, single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE),and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) were calculated for each functional score and analyzed according to age and gender. The percentages of patients achieving MCID and PASS were recorded. The study included 83 patients, with a mean follow-up of 3.5 ± 1.4 years. Significant improvements were found in ASES, Constant, SANE,and VAS for all groups based on gender and age. Based on receiver-operating characteristic curves, all scores had acceptable areas under the curve for PASS. Values for PASS and MCID were 81.5 and 10.3 for ASES; 61.5 and 6.2 for Constant; 82.5 and 11.5 for SANEand 1.5 and 1.1 for VAS, respectively. Analysis of achieving MCID and PASS showed no difference between the groups in the majority of outcome measures. However, female patients achieved the SANE thresholds for PASS at significantly higher rates than male patients. Patients ≥65 years old achieved ASES and Constant thresholds for MCID at significantly higher rates than patients ˂65 years old. Most patients achieved MCID and PASS at a 2-year follow-up. Patients showed comparable rates of MCID and PASS achievement on most outcome tools based on age and gender. Female patients achieved PASS on SANE at significantly higher rates than male patients and older patients achieved MCID on ASES and Constant at higher rates than young patients. Thus, age is a stronger factor for achieving MCID than gender. Level II.

Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using Fascia Lata Autograft Versus Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients 65 Years and Older With Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have both shown favorable outcomes in patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCTs). To (1) compare the clinical outcomes of ASCR versus RSA in patients aged ≥65 years with IRCTs and (2) compare serial changes in clinical outcomes between treatment groups. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. This study included patients with IRCTs without glenohumeral osteoarthritis who underwent either ASCR or RSA between March 2013 and December 2020 and had at least 2 years of follow-up data. We assessed active range of motion, a visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score at the preoperative, short-term (postoperative 6-12 months), and final follow-up times. In total, 64 patients (ASCR, 31 patients; RSA, 33 patients) were included. The mean age of patients was 71.3 ± 4.4 and 72.9 ± 4.1 years, and the mean final follow-up duration was 42 ± 21.8 and 37.7 ± 21.7 months in the ASCR and RSA groups, respectively. At the short-term follow-up, RSA achieved significant improvements in all clinical outcomes, except for internal rotation (IR), while ASCR only showed significant improvements in VAS pain, ASES, and SANE scores. Compared with the preoperative period, both ASCR and RSA achieved significant improvements in all clinical outcomes, except for IR in the RSA group at the final follow-up. The ASCR group achieved better IR and ASES scores at the final follow-up, while the time taken to recover from pseudoparalysis was shorter after RSA. The ASCR group showed a 67.8% graft healing rate at the 1-year follow-up, while the RSA group showed 12.1% of scapular notching at the final follow-up. No other postoperative complications were observed in either group. ASCR and RSA achieved favorable clinical outcomes in the study cohort. At the short-term follow-up, RSA showed significant improvements in all clinical outcomes, except for IR, while ASCR only showed significant improvements in VAS pain, ASES, and SANE scores. At the final follow-up, however, ASCR had better IR and ASES scores compared with RSA.

Outcomes of Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon in Large to Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

(1) Background: Addressing large to massive rotator cuff tears (LMRCTs) poses complex challenges. This systematic review investigated outcomes of superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) compared to conventional rotator cuff repair (RCR) for LMRCTs. (2) Methods: A systematic search across the MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases until 1 October 2023 identified studies that directly compared SCR with LHBT with conventional RCR in patients with LMRCTs and included a minimum of a 12-month follow-up period. The assessed outcome measures encompassed retear rates, functional outcomes, range of motion (ROM), and acromiohumeral interval (AHI). Risk of bias assessment was conducted via the Robins-I tool. (3) Results: In six studies with 456 cases (210 SCR using LHBT and 246 using RCR), SCR with LHBT significantly reduced retear rates (OR = 0.21; 95% CI, 0.12-0.36; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%). Furthermore, SCR with LHBT showed significant improvement in range of forward flexion (SMD 0.32, 95% CI: 0.09-0.55, p < 0.01, I2 = 39%) and AHI (SMD 0.61, 95% CI: 0.31-0.92, p < 0.01, I2 = 0%) postoperatively. (4) Conclusion: SCR with LHBT is a safe and effective treatment for LMRCTs, reducing retear rates, maintaining greater postoperative AHI, and improving ROM compared to conventional RCR. Additional high-quality interventional studies are needed to confirm these results.

Margin convergence vs. superior capsular reconstruction for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: outcomes are equivalent unless there is preoperative pseudoparesis

Margin convergence (MC) and superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) are common treatment options for irreparable rotator cuff tears in younger patients, although they differ in associated costs and operative times. The purpose of this study was to compare range of motion, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and reoperation rates following MC and SCR. We hypothesized superior outcomes after SCR relative to MC regarding functional outcomes, subjective measures, and reoperation rates. This was a multicenter retrospective review of 59 patients from 3 surgeons treating irreparable rotator cuff tears with either MC (n=28) or SCR (n=31) and minimum 1-year follow-up from 2014-2019. Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), active forward flexion (FF), external rotation (ER), retear rate, and conversion rate to reverse shoulder arthroplasty were evaluated. t tests and χ2 tests were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively (P<.05). Baseline demographics, range of motion, and magnetic resonance imaging findings were similar between groups. Average follow-up was 31.5 months and 17.8 months for the MC and SCR groups, respectively (P<.001). The MC and SCR groups had similar postoperative FF (151°±26° vs. 142°±38°; P=.325) and ER (48°±12° vs. 46°±11°; P=.284), with both groups not improving significantly from their preoperative baselines. However, both cohorts demonstrated significant improvements in VAS score (MC: 7.3 to 2.5; SCR: 6.4 to 1.0) and SSV (MC: 54% to 82%; SCR: 38% to 87%). There were no significant differences in postoperative VAS scores, SSV, and rates of retear or rates of conversion to arthroplasty between the MC and SCR groups. In patients with preoperative pseudoparesis (FF<90°), SCR (n=9) resulted in greater postoperative FF than MC (n=5) (141°±38° vs. 67°±24°; P=.002). Both MC and SCR demonstrated excellent postoperative outcomes in the setting of massive irreparable rotator cuff tear, with significant improvements in PROs and no significant differences in range of motion. Specifically for patients with preoperative pseudoparesis, SCR was more effective in restoring forward elevation. Further long-term studies are needed to compare outcomes and establish appropriate indications.

Mid-term Outcome of Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using Fascia Lata Autograft (At Least 6 mm in Thickness) Results in High Retear Rate and No Improvement in Muscle Strength

(1) To report and evaluate clinical and radiologic outcomes of superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) using fascia lata autograft in patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCTs) over a mid-term duration and (2) to assess the overall survival rate of the graft. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent SCR with fascia lata autograft between June 2017 and August 2018. The graft, folded 3 or 4 times, achieved a minimum thickness of 6 mm during the surgical procedure. The inclusion criteria encompassed patients with isolated supraspinatus IRCTs or posterosuperior IRCTs exhibiting poor muscle quality (Goutallier grade ≥3) and without arthritis (Hamada grade ≤ 2). The exclusion criteria included lack of follow-up data or magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical assessments included the visual analog scale score, Constant score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score; active range of motion; and strength. Radiographic analysis included the acromiohumeral distance, Hamada grade, and graft integrity at final follow-up. A Kaplan-Meier curve was generated to depict SCR graft survivorship. In total, 45 patients (mean age, 64.8 ± 5.7 years) were included, and the average follow-up duration was 63.2 ± 5.9 months (range, 50-79 months). There was significant improvement in pain (visual analog scale score of 4.4 ± 1.3 preoperatively vs 1.4 ± 0.4 at final follow-up, P < .001). Yet, 18 patients (40.0%) and 17 patients (37.7%) achieved the minimal clinically important difference in the ASES score and Constant score, respectively. Active forward elevation increased from 119° ± 23° to 137° ± 23° (P < .001), and external rotation at the side improved from 29° ± 11° to 36° ± 12° (P= .002). However, strength did not exhibit improvement in any direction. The acromiohumeral distance decreased from 8.5 ± 1.7 mm to 6.5 ± 1.9 mm (P < .001), and the Hamada grade increased from 1.1 ± 0.3 to 1.8 ± 1.1 (P < .001). Finally, the infection rate was 13.3% (n= 6). Despite a substantial graft retear rate of 62.2%, SCR led to a significant improvement in pain. Nonetheless, 18 patients (40.0%) and 17 patients (37.7%) achieved the minimal clinically important difference in the ASES score and Constant score, respectively. Forward elevation and external rotation at the side showed significant improvement, but no improvement in muscle strength was observed. Finally, significant arthritis progression was observed. Level IV, retrospective case series.

Preoperative MRI Rotator Cuff Tendon Stump Classification Correlates with the Surgical Outcomes Following Superior Capsular Reconstruction

PurposeTo investigate the correlation between rotator cuff stump classification and postoperative outcomes after superior capsular reconstruction (SCR). MethodsA total of 75 patients who underwent SCR between June 2013 and May 2021 were included in this study. Based on stump classification using the signal intensity ratio of the tendon rupture site to the deltoid muscle in the coronal view of preoperative T2-weighted, fat-suppressed MRI scans, the patients were classified into types 1, 2, and 3 with ratios of < 0.8, 0.8–1.3, and > 1.3 (44, 17, and 14 patients, respectively). The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain and range of motion were evaluated at a minimum of 1 year of follow-up postoperatively. The acromiohumeral distance and RC tear arthropathy according to the Hamada classification were assessed on plain radiography. Postoperative graft integrity was evaluated by MRI at 3 and 12 months postoperatively and annually thereafter. Graft failure was defined as complete discontinuity. ResultsClinical and radiological outcomes were significantly improved after SCR. In comparison with type 2 and 3 patients, type 1 patients had significantly higher ASES scores (type 1, 2, and 3 = 84 ± 10, 75 ± 15, and 76 ± 14; all P = 0.014), constant scores (type 1, 2, and 3 = 65 ± 5, 61 ± 9, and 56 ± 13; all P = 0.005), and forward flexion (type 1, 2, and 3 = 155 ± 10, 154 ± 15, and 145 ± 13; all P = 0.013). However, these statistical differences between groups were below the established minimum clinically important difference values for the ASES and Constant scores after rotator cuff repair. The graft failure rate after surgery was lower in the type 1 group than that in the other two groups; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.749). ConclusionPatients with stump classification type 1 showed significantly better functional scores (ASES and VAS scores) and forward flexion; however, the clinical importance of these differences may be limited. Stump classification may be useful for predicting postoperative clinical outcomes.

Combined Anterior Latissimus Dorsi and Teres Major Tendon Transfer (aLDTM) for Irreparable Anterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears.

Transfer of the anterior latissimus dorsi and teres major (LDTM) tendons has demonstrated favorable outcomes in patients with irreparable anterosuperior rotator cuff tears1. The objective of this procedure is to restore internal rotation strength, enhance active range of motion, and provide pain relief while preserving the glenohumeral joint. The incision extended from the coracoid to the inferior border of the pectoralis major tendon, following the deltopectoral interval located laterally to the coracoid. While preserving the pectoralis major tendon, the latissimus dorsi (LD) and teres major (TM) tendons are identified and detached from the humerus without separating the tendons. The LDTM tendons are grasped, and nonabsorbable sutures are placed in a continuous running-locking suture fashion. Traction is applied to the sutures while bluntly releasing the adhesions surrounding the LDTM muscles in order to enable further mobilization and excursion. With the patient's arm positioned in full internal rotation and at 45° of abduction for physiological tensioning, the LDTM tendons are attached 2 cm distal to the lateral edge of the greater tuberosity and lateral to the biceps groove with use of 1 medial anchor and 3 lateral anchors. Arthroscopic partial repair, superior capsular reconstruction, pectoralis major tendon transfer, and isolated LD tendon transfer are potential alternative treatments. In cases in which these options are not feasible or have been unsuccessful, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty can be considered as a treatment option. Arthroscopic partial repair can provide pain relief, but its effectiveness in improving range of motion and muscle strength is limited2,3. Additionally, there is a high risk of retear, with reported rates as high as 52%4. Superior capsular reconstruction is considered a viable treatment, but it is not recommended in cases involving irreparable subscapularis tears5-7. Pectoralis major transfer may lead to less favorable clinical outcomes in cases in which an irreparable subscapularis tear and an irreparable supraspinatus tear are simultaneously present8-10. In cases of irreparable anterosuperior rotator cuff tears, the transfer of the LD tendon alone may not fully restore the superior migration and anterior subluxation of the humeral head.11. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty may be another option in these cases, but it does not preserve the glenohumeral joint. The procedure involves stabilizing the superior translation of the humeral head by rebalancing the force couple, as the TM tendon exhibits scapulohumeral kinematics similar to the subscapularis tendon. Additionally, the procedure effectively reduces anterior glenohumeral subluxation through the combined effect of the posterior line of pull from the combined LDTM tendons and the scapulohumeral kinematics of the teres minor tendon. Also, by fixing the transferred LDTM tendons just distal to the greater tuberosity, the vector becomes less vertical, thereby preventing axillary nerve impingement and achieving appropriate tendon tensioning. The use of this procedure is supported by a study of 30 patients who were followed for a minimum of 2 years1. Significant improvements were observed in various scoring systems, including the pain VAS (visual analogue scale), Constant, ASES (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons), UCLA (University of California-Los Angeles), SANE (Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation), and ADLIR (Activities of Daily Living requiring active Internal Rotation) scores. Importantly, there was no significant progression of cuff tear arthropathy observed during the final follow-up. Additionally, preoperative anterior glenohumeral subluxation (15 of 30 patients) was restored in all patients after LDTM tendon transfer. Careful attention should be paid to the anterior humeral circumflex vessels to prevent bleeding.The radial nerve, passing through the anteroinferior surface of the LDTM tendons, should be carefully identified and protected to avoid iatrogenic injury.To maintain physiologic tension, the patient's arm should be positioned in full internal rotation and 45° of abduction.To avoid axillary nerve impingement, the LDTM tendons should be fixed just distal to the greater tuberosity and lateral to the biceps groove. SCR = superior capsular reconstructionLDTM = latissimus dorsi combined with teres majorASRCTs = anterosuperior rotator cuff tearsA/S = arthroscopicROM = range of motionTM = teres majorTm = teres minorLD = latissimus dorsiSSC = subscapularisSSP = supraspinatusPM = Pectoralis majorPm = Pectoralis minorRSA = reverse total shoulder arthroplastyASES = American Shoulder and Elbow SurgeonsUCLA = University of California-Los AngelesADLIR = Activities of Daily Living requiring active Internal RotationGT = greater tuberosityACR = anterior capsular reconstructionFF = forward flexionER = external rotationIR = internal rotationAHD = acromiohumeral distanceMRI = magnetic resonance imagingISP = infraspinatusPEEK = polyetheretherketonePOD = postoperative dayEMG = electromyographySD = standard deviationBMI = body mass indexDM = diabetes mellitusHTN = hypertensionVAS = visual analogue scaleSANE = Single Assessment Numeric EvaluationaROM =active range of motion.

Comparison of Multiple Surgical Treatments for Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears in Patients Younger Than 70 Years of Age: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) remain a challenging treatment paradigm, particularly for nonelderly patients without pseudoparalysis or arthritis. To use a network meta-analysis to analyze comparative studies of surgical treatment options for MIRCTs in patients <70 years of age for several patient-reported outcomes, range of motion (ROM), and acromiohumeral distance (AHD). Network meta-analysis of comparative studies; Level of evidence, 3. A systematic review of the literature, using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted from 2017 to 2022. Inclusion criteria were (1) clinical comparative studies of MIRCTs (with several study-specific criteria); (2) ≥1 outcome of interest reported on, with standard deviations; (3) minimum 1-year follow-up; and (4) mean age of <70 years for both cohorts, without arthritis or pseudoparalysis. There were 8 treatment arms compared. Outcomes of interest were the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant-Murley score, visual analog scale for pain, AHD, and forward flexion and external rotation ROM. A frequentist approach to network meta-analysis with a random-effects model was performed using the netmeta package Version 0.9-6 in R. A total of 23 studies met the inclusion criteria, with 1178 patients included in the network meta-analysis. There was a mean weighted age of 62.8 years, 568 (48.2%) men, with a mean follow-up of 28.9 months. There were no significant differences between groups in regard to sex (P = .732) or age (P = .469). For the ASES score, InSpace balloon arthroplasty (mean difference [MD], 12.34; 95% CI, 2.18 to 22.50; P = .017), arthroscopic bridging graft (aBG) (MD, 7.07; 95% CI, 0.28 to 13.85; P = .041), and long head of biceps augmented superior capsular reconstruction (BSCR) (MD, 5.16; 95% CI, 1.10 to 9.22; P = .013) resulted in the highest P-scores. For the Constant-Murley score, debridement (MD, 21.03; 95% CI, 8.98 to 33.08; P < .001) and aBG (MD, 6.97; 95% CI, 1.88 to 12.05; P = .007) resulted in the highest P-scores. For AHD, BSCR resulted in the highest P-score (MD, 1.46; 95% CI, 0.45 to 2.48; P = .005). For forward flexion ROM, debridement (MD, 45.77; 95% CI, 25.41 to 66.13; P < .001) resulted in the highest P-score, while RSA resulted in the lowest P-score (MD, -16.70; 95% CI, -31.20 to -2.20; P = .024). For patients <70 years with MIRCT without significant arthritis or pseudoparalysis, it appears that graft interposition repair techniques, superior capsular reconstruction using the long head of the biceps tendon, arthroscopic debridement, and balloon arthroplasty provide superiority in various outcome domains, while RSA provides the least benefit in forward flexion.

Patients With Intact Shoulder Superior Capsular Reconstruction Grafts on Ultrasound Show Significant Improvement in Functional Outcomes at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

To assess the utility of using dynamic ultrasound for postoperative evaluation after superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) by evaluating graft integrity and its correlation with clinical outcomes at a minimum 2-year follow-up. A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify patients who underwent SCR between July 2015 and July 2020 with a minimum 2-year clinical and ultrasound follow-up. Clinical outcome measures included Simple Shoulder (SS) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) scores. Integrity of the SCR graft was evaluated by dynamic ultrasound. We evaluated 22 shoulders in 21 patients with a mean follow-up of 44.8 months (range, 24-71 months). The graft was found to be intact by ultrasound evaluation in 82% (18/22). Patients with intact grafts had higher mean SS (11.6 vs 7.8, P= .00079) and ASES (91.2 vs 64.1, P= .0296) scores at latest follow-up compared to those with failed grafts. Those with intact grafts also had significant improvement in SS (3.7 vs 11.6, P < .00001) and ASES (23.2 vs 91.2, P < .00001) scores at latest follow-up compared to their preoperative scores. In contrast, patients with graft failure had no significant improvement in SS (6.3 vs 9.0, P= .123) and ASES (40.4 vs 58.3, P= .05469) scores at latest follow-up compared to their preoperative scores. There was no difference between clinical outcomes at 6 to 12 months vs latest follow-up for both SS (P= .11, P= .5) and ASES (P= .27, P= .21) scores. SCR grafts were found by ultrasound to be intact in 82% of cases. Patients with intact grafts on ultrasound had significant improvement in functional outcome scores while those with graft failure did not. Functional outcome scores suggest that maximal recovery from this procedure occurs by 6 to 12 months. Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Superior Capsular Reconstruction Versus Middle Trapezius Tendon Transfer for Isolated Irreparable Supraspinatus Tendon Tears: Static Versus Dynamic Reconstruction

Background: Both superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) and middle trapezius tendon (MTT) transfer can be performed in nonarthritic young and active patients with isolated irreparable supraspinatus tendon tears (IISTTs). However, to our knowledge, no comparative clinical studies have been conducted on these procedures. Purpose: To evaluate and compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of SCR and arthroscopic-assisted MTT transfer in patients with IISTTs. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 60 patients with IISTTs were categorized into 2 groups according to the surgical procedure—Group S underwent SCR (n = 34); Group M underwent MTT transfer (n = 26). The clinical outcomes included the visual analog scale score for pain, active shoulder range of motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and University of California, Los Angeles, shoulder score. Radiological outcomes included the assessment of the acromiohumeral distance, progression of cuff tear arthropathy (Hamada grade), subacromial bone erosion, and graft failure. Results: The mean follow-up time was 39.3 ± 5.2 months (range, 26-59 months) and 37.6 ± 9.8 months (range, 27-54 months) in Group S and Group M, respectively. Significant improvements in clinical outcomes were observed in both groups, while the active forward flexion (148.2°± 24.1° vs 165.9°± 8.7°; P = .003) and abduction (131°± 37.3° vs 152.5°± 17.9°; P = .035) were significantly higher in Group M at the final follow-up. No significant differences were found in the postoperative Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and University of California, Los Angeles, shoulder scores between the 2 groups. Radiologically, although no difference was found in the Hamada grade at the final follow-up between the 2 groups (P = .143), the rates of acromial wear (58.8% vs 15.4%; P < .001) and graft retear (47.1% vs 7.7%; P < .001) were significantly higher in Group S than in Group M. Conclusion: Both SCR and MTT transfer improved the overall clinical outcomes of IISTTs postoperatively, whereas MTT transfer was superior to SCR in terms of active forward flexion and abduction range of motion. Although higher rates of graft failure and subacromial bone erosion were observed in Group S, no difference was found in the clinical scores between the 2 groups at the short-term follow-up. However, further well-structured, prolonged comparative trials should be conducted in the future.

Surgical management for massive rotator cuff tears: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Multiple surgical strategies have been developed for treating massive rotator cuff tears (mRCTs). However, there is still no consensus on the best surgical option for mRCTs. Through a network meta-analysis, we aimed to comprehensively and systematically analyse the evidence in randomized controlled trials to help clinicians make evidence-based clinical decisions for patients with mRCTs. Our study was a network meta-analysis of the surgical management of mRCTs (PROSPERO Registration ID: CRD42023397971). We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials that examined the efficacy of surgical management for mRCTs up to 3 November 2022. A three-step method was employed for the study process. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias evaluation were conducted by two independent reviewers. R software (version 4.2.1) and Stata (version 15.1) were used for the data analysis. From 10,633 publications, we included 15 randomized controlled trials (996 participants) for the quantitative analysis. In terms of both long-term and short-term surgical effects, there were no statistically significant differences among surgical interventions such as patch-augmented rotator cuff repair (RCR), RCR with platelet-rich plasma, arthroscopic decompression, bridging reconstruction, arthroscopic RCR with platelet-leukocyte membrane, open RCR, mini-open RCR, arthroscopic debridement, superior capsular reconstruction, arthroscopic suture-spanning augmented repair, subacromial balloon spacer and latissimus dorsi tendon transfer. Based on algorithms, the probability ranking suggests that patch augmentation is the most highly ranked surgical intervention for achieving better short-term surgical outcomes. Furthermore, arthroscopic-associated mini-open RCR was ranked as the highest surgical intervention for achieving better long-term surgical effects. Based on the available data from the included studies, similar surgical efficacies were observed among the reported intervention measures for mRCTs. The patch augmentation technique was found to potentially achieve better short-term surgical outcomes, which is consistent with previous reports. However, the best surgical interventions for achieving long-term surgical effects remain unknown. More high-quality research is needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these interventions and to guide clinical practice.

Does body mass index affect outcomes following arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction using fascia lata autograft for massive irreparable rotator cuff tear?

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of increased body mass index (BMI) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinically significant outcomes (CSOs) obtained > two years postoperatively following arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR). A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent ASCR with a minimum two year follow-up. All patients were divided into normal (BMI < 25.0), overweight (BMI 25-30.0), and obese (BMI ≥ 30) according to preoperative BMI. Patients were assessed using the PROs preoperatively and at six months, one year, and two years postoperatively, including the visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and Constant-Murley scores. The time required to achieve each CSO was analyzed and compared. Multivariate analyses evaluated the predictor variables and time required to achieve CSOs. This study included 63 patients with a mean age of 64.8 ± 8.6 years, including 31 normal BMI, 25 overweight, and seven obese patients. Significant improvements in VAS and ASES scores after ASCR were observed in all three groups. Normal and overweight patients had significant improvements in the Constant score; however, no difference was observed in obese patients. No significant difference was observed in the probability distributions of CSOs between the BMI groups. Similarly, no significant differences were observed in the probability distributions of the CSOs, ASES, and Constant scores at each time point, among the BMI groups. Patients in the normal and overweight groups had significant improvements in the VAS, ASES, and Constant scores after ASCR. Patients in the obese group had a significant improvement in VAS score; however, there is no difference for the ASES and Constant scores in the obese group. However, no differences were observed in all PROMs and the likelihood of achieving CSOs among the different BMI groups.

Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using Hybrid Autologous Fascia Lata and the Long Head of Biceps Tendon Graft: the Central Beam Concept

Superior capsular reconstruction is a joint salvage treatment option for retracted irreparable rotator cuff tears in relatively young patients. Various graft options have been described in the literature, including autologous fascia lata graft, synthetic graft, and dermal patches. Superior capsular reconstruction using long head of biceps tendon autograft alone has also been described by few authors. In this technical note, we describe a modified technique of performing arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction using both fascia lata graft and the intra articular portion of the long head of biceps tendon. Our technique resembles central beam concept over which the fascia lata graft is anchored, providing good structural support to the graft and enabling graft healing and improved clinical outcomes.

Interposition Grafting Using Fascia Lata Autograft for Failed Rotator Cuff Repairs

Massive rotator cuff tears are a huge challenge for orthopaedic surgeons, as the patients may be in need of multiple operations, even including reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The various repair methods for the rotator cuff, such as partial rotator cuff repair, patch-augmented rotator cuff repair, bridging rotator cuff reconstruction with graft interposition, tendon transfer, and superior capsular reconstruction, have always been the focus of research. During surgical intervention for failed rotator cuff repairs, complexity of tears, poor tissue quality, retained hardware, and adhesions are the problems routinely encountered. In this Technical Note, we describe the technique of interposition grafting using fascia lata autograft to reconstruct the rotator cuff after failed primary repair.

Reversing Chronic Pseudoparesis Secondary to Massive, Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tear: Superior Capsular Reconstruction vs Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Recent studies have defined pseudoparesis as limited active forward elevation between 45° and 90° and maintained passive range of motion (ROM) in the setting of a massive rotator cuff tear (RCT). Although pseudoparesis can be reliably reversed with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) or superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), the optimal treatment for this indication remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of RSA to SCR in patients with pseudoparesis secondary to massive, irreparable RCT (miRCT). This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients aged 40-70 years with pseudoparesis secondary to miRCT who were treated with either RSA or SCR by a single fellowship-trained shoulder surgeon from 2016 to 2021 with a minimum 12-month follow-up. Multivariate linear regression modeling was used to compare active ROM, visual analog pain scale (VAS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score between RSA and SCR while controlling for confounding variables. Twenty-seven patients were included in the RSA cohort and 23 patients were included in the SCR cohort with similar mean follow-up times (26.2±21.1 vs. 21.9±14.7 months, respectively). The patients in the RSA group were significantly older than those in the SCR group (65.2±4.4 vs. 54.2±7.8 years, P<.001) and had more severe arthritis (1.8±0.9 vs. 1.2±0.5 Samilson-Prieto, P=.019). The pseudoparesis reversal rate among the RSA and SCR cohorts was 96.3% and 91.3%, respectively. On univariate analysis, the RSA cohort demonstrated significantly greater mean improvement in active FF (89° ±26° vs. 73°±30° change, P=.048), greater postoperative SSV (91±8% vs. 69±25%, P<.001), lower postoperative VAS pain scores (0.6±1.2 vs. 2.2±2.9, P=.020), and less postoperative internal rotation (IR; 4.6°±1.6° vs. 6.9°±1.8°, P=.004) compared with SCR. On multivariate analysis controlling for age and osteoarthritis, RSA remained a significant predictor of greater SSV (β=21.5, P=.021) and lower VAS scores (β=-1.4, P=.037), whereas SCR was predictive of greater IR ROM (β=3.0, P=.043). Although both RSA and SCR effectively reverse pseudoparesis, patients with RSA have higher SSV and lower pain scores but less IR after controlling for age and osteoarthritis. The results of this study may inform surgical decision making for patients who are suitable candidates for either procedure.

Superior capsular reconstruction for irreparable rotator cuff tear: a review of current methods.

Irreparable massive rotator cuff tears can significantly impact daily life; and these types of tears can be difficult to repair completely, especially in younger patients who are more active and have higher functional requirements. Since its introduction by Mihata and the colleagues, superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) has gained popularity in the treatment of irreparable massive rotator cuff tears and has shown promising short-term results. A variety of studies have focused on the clinical and biomechanical outcomes of this procedure. This article reviews the biomechanics, indications for the surgical procedure, graft options, surgical technique, and rehabilitation from SCR.

Superior Capsular Reconstruction Combined With Lower Trapezius Tendon Transfer Improves the Biomechanics in Posterosuperior Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

Background: Surgical treatments for chronic posterosuperior massive rotator cuff tear (MRCT) are still controversial. Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), which provides a static stabilizer to decrease superior humeral head translation, and lower trapezius tendon transfer (LTTT) with centralization of the humeral head, which prevents superior humeral head migration, are potential surgical options. To date, SCR combined with LTTT has not been fully investigated. Hypothesis: Restoration of static stabilizer and dynamic stabilizer together would effectively improve shoulder kinematics in posterosuperior MRCT. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A custom-made shoulder mechanics testing system was used to test 8 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders. The testing conditions were as follows: (1) intact; (2) posterosuperior MRCT (supraspinatus and infraspinatus removed); (3) SCR using the fascia lata; (4) LTTT; and (5) SCR combined with LTTT. The total rotational range of motion (ROM), superior translation, anteroposterior translation, and peak subacromial contact pressure were evaluated at 0°, 30°, and 60° of shoulder abduction. Repeated-measures analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc tests were performed. Results: The total rotational ROM, superior translation, anteroposterior translation, and peak subacromial contact pressure increased in posterosuperior MRCTs (all, P < .05). The rotational ROM, superior translation, anteroposterior translation, and peak subacromial contact pressure at 0° and 30° of shoulder abduction decreased in SCR (all, P < .05). However, there was no significant improvement in rotational ROM, superior translation, and peak subacromial contact pressure at 60° of shoulder abduction (P > .05). LTTT resulted in a significant decrease in the superior translation, anteroposterior translation, and peak subacromial contact pressure at 0°, 30°, and 60° of shoulder abduction (P < .05). SCR combined with LTTT restored the total rotational ROM, superior translation, anteroposterior translation, and peak subacromial contact pressure at 0°, 30°, and 60° of shoulder abduction (all, P < .05). Conclusion: In the cadaveric model, SCR combined with LTTT showed improved shoulder kinematics and contact pressures in the posterosuperior MRCT model compared with SCR or LTTT alone. Clinical Relevance: SCR combined with LTTT may be regarded as an alternative surgical procedure for posterosuperior MRCTs.